When EDR Goes to Sleep: Why “Detect & Respond” Alone Isn’t Enough

You might have heard about EDR-Freeze, the proof-of-concept tool recently revealed that can place endpoint detection and response (EDR) and antivirus agents into a suspended “coma” state. Cyber Security News+1

The EDR-Freeze attack leverages legitimate Windows functions—namely MiniDumpWriteDump and WerFaultSecure.exe—to freeze security processes indefinitely. In effect, the defender’s eyes and ears go dark at the worst possible moment.

This development is a sharp reminder: threat actors are evolving their techniques to neutralize even advanced security tools. For business leaders, it underscores a clear imperative—don’t just detect threats. Contain them.

The EDR-Freeze Threat: A Deeper Look

What makes EDR-Freeze especially insidious is that it:

1. Uses legitimate OS behavior. It avoids the risky business of installing vulnerable drivers (like many Bring-Your-Own-Vulnerable-Driver or BYOVD attacks). Instead, it works entirely from user mode, manipulating built-in Windows functions.

2. Suspends threads indefinitely. The trick lies in prolonging the thread suspension performed by MiniDumpWriteDump. By then suspending the helper process (WerFaultSecure), the attack prevents the target from resuming.

3. Blindspots the defenses. Because the EDR or antivirus remains present (just suspended), many systems won’t trigger an alert for “process termination” or “agent crash.” The tool is essentially neutered—not removed.

4. Gives attackers a stealth window. Once defenses are silenced, attackers can move laterally, exfiltrate data, or deploy payloads—all under the radar until they unsuspend the agent (or reboot). 

We should treat EDR-Freeze not as a fringe proof-of-concept, but a signal: defenders must question the assumption that detection tools will always remain operative during an attack.

Why “Detect and Respond” Isn’t Enough Today

For years, standard wisdom in cybersecurity has leaned on the detect-and-respond model. You aim to spot suspicious behavior, issue alerts, and then remediate or isolate. But EDR-Freeze highlights a gaping weakness in that model:

• If your detection system itself can be disabled, your ability to respond is nullified.

• An attacker who silences your monitoring is very close to operating without constraints.

• By the time you discover the attack (via logs, notifications, or user reports), vital damage may already be done.

Many organizations today still function under that assumption: detection is the core, and response is secondary. But the truth is, detection is only useful if your defenses remain active. In a landscape where adversaries can silence detection engines, you also need mechanisms that isolate, contain, and stop threats in their tracks—even when the defender’s sensors are under attack.

Enter AppGuard: Protecting Beyond Detection

That’s where AppGuard comes in. AppGuard is a proven endpoint protection solution with over ten years of operational history. It doesn’t simply try to detect threats—it prevents them by enforcing strict control over what code is allowed to run, and by isolating suspicious behavior before it impacts critical systems.

Here’s how AppGuard addresses modern threat challenges like EDR-Freeze:

• Prevention-first design. Instead of waiting for something malicious to appear, AppGuard asserts control over allowable behaviors. If a process tries to deviate from its permitted behavior, AppGuard intervenes.

• Containment and isolation. Should a suspicious or novel behavior emerge, AppGuard can isolate that process (or agent) within a safeguard zone. Even if detection systems are frozen, the malicious activity is constrained.

• Defending the defenders. AppGuard's enforcement is independent of the traditional EDR/antivirus stack—meaning attacks that target those layers (like EDR-Freeze) cannot easily bypass AppGuard’s control logic.

• Mature track record. With more than a decade of use (including high-threat environments), AppGuard has proven resilient against advanced tactics and evasions.

When put together, this means you no longer rely solely on detection to “see” an attack—you can stop many attacks before they take root or spread.

Real-World Scenarios Where AppGuard Makes a Difference

• Neutralizing zero-days. Even when a threat uses a previously unknown exploit (for which detection rules do not yet exist), if the payload attempts to deviate or escalate privileges, it can be contained by AppGuard.

• Preventing lateral movement. Once an attacker gains a foothold and tries to run tools like Mimikatz, credential dumpers, or lateral scripts, AppGuard can block or contain them—even if your EDR is paused.

• Thwarting fileless attacks. Many modern attacks avoid dropping files; they live in memory or misuse trusted tools. AppGuard intervenes at the behavior level, limiting what those tools can do.

• Ensuring resiliency under attack. When a portion of your security stack is compromised or disabled, AppGuard continues operating as a guardrail outside of the compromised surfaces.

In short, AppGuard closes the gap that EDR-Freeze and similar evasion techniques reveal.

Shifting Your Security Strategy: Detect & Respond → Contain & Defend

To resist modern threats, organizations must evolve their security posture. Here’s how you can shift your orientation:

1. Reframe your objectives. Don’t view detection as the end goal. View it as a tool—one layer in a strategy whose true goal is containment and interruption of malicious behavior.

2. Layer your defenses. Detection is still necessary, but it must coexist with enforcement and isolation strategies (like those offered by AppGuard).

3. Assume defender tools can be attacked. If your detection or remediation tools can be disabled, your posture must survive that scenario.

4. Continuously validate containment. Use red teaming, adversary simulations, and “failure-mode” testing to ensure your isolation controls work when under stress.

5. Adopt solutions that are enforcement-first. Look for protection technologies that don’t sit passively and wait—they assert policy and block deviations.

In light of EDR-Freeze, it’s clear that “detect and respond” was never enough. The future of endpoint security must center around isolation, containment, and enforcement.

A Call to Action: Secure Your Defense Strategy Today

The revelation of EDR-Freeze should be a wake-up call for business leaders and IT security teams—your detection systems can be targeted and disabled. But your defenses don’t have to go dark.

At CHIPS, we believe the next frontier in endpoint protection is containment and enforcement, not just detection. AppGuard offers that next frontier—a hardened, policy-driven protection layer that blocks threats, isolates suspicious behavior, and stays active even when attackers aim at your security tools themselves.

If you run a business and care about protecting your data, systems, and reputation, now is the time to act:

👉 Talk with us at CHIPS about how AppGuard can prevent incidents like EDR-Freeze from becoming your reality. Let’s work together to shift from “detect & respond” to “isolate & contain” — so your security holds up even when attackers try to blind your defenses.

Contact us today to learn how AppGuard can be integrated into your environment, and let us help you build the resilient protection posture your organization deserves.

Like this article? Please share it with others!