In a worrying development for cybersecurity, a new malware-as-a-service (MaaS) called Stanley is emerging as a threat to organizations and individual users alike. According to BleepingComputer, Stanley promises operators the ability to bypass Google’s extension review process and publish malicious phishing extensions directly onto the official Chrome Web Store.
This is more than just a nuisance for tech enthusiasts. Browser extensions have long been a vector for attacks, but the idea of a service that guarantees malicious extensions make it through a security review raises the stakes for businesses that rely on endpoint security and employee browser usage.
Stanley is a malware service marketed to bad actors that lets them produce and publish malicious Chrome extensions that act as phishing tools. These extensions can overlay a full-screen iframe of attacker content while keeping the victim’s address bar showing a legitimate domain. In practice, this means unsuspecting users could be tricked into entering credentials or sensitive data directly into a fake interface that appears trustworthy.
The service even offers features like silent auto-installation on multiple browsers, geographic targeting, and persistent command-and-control communications. That means once a malicious extension is installed it can continue to monitor and intercept activity without easy detection.
This threat is part of a broader trend. Security researchers have found hundreds of millions of Chrome extensions installed that contain malware or violate store policies, with a significant portion exposing users to credential theft, tracking, or malicious redirection.
Browser extensions have long been a favored attack surface. Many promise productivity or task automation but request broad permissions that can include reading or modifying all web page data. That is exactly the capability attackers need to capture logins, session tokens, or other sensitive information.
In other recent examples, malicious extensions have accumulated hundreds of thousands to millions of installs before removal, allowing attackers to build wide pools of compromised users and devices.
For enterprises, this danger is acute. A malicious extension installed on an employee’s device can become a launch point for phishing, credential theft, or lateral movement into corporate environments. Traditional security tools often struggle to detect these threats in real time because they exploit legitimate browser extension mechanisms rather than known malware file signatures.
Most endpoint security solutions today operate on a detect and respond model. They look for indicators of compromise, signatures, or behavior that matches known threats, then alert security teams after the fact. Unfortunately with threats like Stanley, by the time a phishing extension is detected, damage may already be done — credentials stolen, sessions hijacked, or accounts compromised.
Real-time prevention becomes critical when malicious code is masquerading as a trusted extension and silently embedding itself into everyday workflows. Given how quickly attackers can adapt, the window between exploit and detection can be just minutes or seconds.
This is where a different approach to endpoint protection like AppGuard makes a measurable difference.
AppGuard has a decade of proven success protecting systems by focusing on isolation and containment, not just detection. Instead of trying to chase every new variant of malware — a task that gets exponentially harder as attackers innovate — AppGuard locks down the execution environment. It prevents unauthorized code from executing in the first place, stopping phishing extensions and browser-based threats from ever gaining traction on a corporate endpoint.
Key advantages of this approach include:
These capabilities matter in a landscape where threat actors are automating their attacks and finding new ways to slip past legacy protections.
At this moment, the rise of services like Stanley is a wake-up call for businesses to rethink their endpoint security strategy. The days of “detect and respond” as a sole defense are over. Modern threats demand modern defenses.
If your organization depends on endpoint security tools that only report after an attack has begun, you are leaving a gap that attackers will exploit. That includes threats like malicious browser extensions that bypass review processes, hijack sessions, or steal credentials.
Call to Action: Talk with us at CHIPS about how AppGuard can prevent incidents like this. AppGuard’s proven isolation and containment approach protects your endpoints from even the most cunning threats. Move beyond detect and respond and secure your business with prevention that works. Contact our team today to learn more.
Like this article? Please share it with others!