Ransomware remains one of the most serious cyber threats facing businesses today — and the recent warning from Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) about Akira ransomware should be a wake‑up call for companies everywhere. In its joint advisory (Alert Code AA24‑109A), CISA — together with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Europol European Cybercrime Centre (EC3), and NCSC‑NL — details just how dangerous Akira has become. CISA+2CISA+2
Since March 2023, Akira has impacted over 250 organizations across North America, Europe, and Australia. What started as Windows‑focused ransomware quickly evolved — by August 2023 the attackers began deploying variants written in Rust (including “Megazord” and “Akira_v2”), and expanded their targets to include Linux environments and virtual machines (VMware ESXi, and now even hypervisors like Nutanix AHV).
In typical Akira attacks, adversaries gain initial access by exploiting known — and often remediable — vulnerabilities in internet‑facing VPN appliances and backup servers. They use weaknesses in VPN solutions without MFA enabled, or employ stolen or brute‑forced credentials, spear phishing, or exposed remote desktop services. After foothold, attackers move laterally using legitimate admin tools and remote‑access software (AnyDesk, LogMeIn, MobaXterm, etc.), disable security software, exfiltrate data, and then deploy encryption.
Once deployed, Akira uses a hybrid encryption scheme (ChaCha20 + RSA) that efficiently locks files of varying types and sizes. Files end up with extensions like “.akira” or “.powerranges.” To make things worse, the malware deletes Volume Shadow Copies to prevent file recovery, crippling standard restore procedures.
By late 2025, the cost of these attacks has skyrocketed: analysts estimate the group has extorted around US$244 million in ransom payments. That makes Akira one of the most financially damaging ransomware operations in recent years.
Why Traditional “Detect and Respond” Is Not Enough
Most defenses today rely on detection mechanisms — anti‑virus, endpoint detection and response (EDR), threat hunting, network monitoring. These tools assume threats will manifest in recognizable patterns and then attempt to stop or remediate them.
But Akira is designed to bypass those defenses. By exploiting legitimate tools and system vulnerabilities, disabling security software, and leveraging “living‑off‑the‑land” techniques, attackers delay detection or avoid it altogether. Even when defenders are alerted — often only after exfiltration or encryption is underway — it may already be too late.
What this highlights is a fundamental weakness: detection after the fact still allows attackers to breach, exfiltrate, encrypt, and potentially disrupt operations — even if you eventually respond or recover. In the world of modern ransomware like Akira, “detect‑and‑respond” is reactive. And reaction often means damage already done.
Why “Isolation and Containment” Is the Better Strategy — and How AppGuard Delivers It
Isolation and containment flips the script. Instead of waiting for a threat to be detected, you assume that attackers will attempt to breach, and proactively block – or isolate – suspicious activity before it spreads. This approach contains damage before it becomes catastrophic.
That is exactly what AppGuard was designed to do. With a proven 10‑year track record of protecting endpoints against advanced threats, AppGuard offers a fundamentally different way to secure your organization:
-
By limiting what code and applications are allowed to run, AppGuard makes it extremely hard for ransomware — even sophisticated, custom ones like Akira_v2 or Megazord — to execute.
-
Even if ransomware gains initial access through a compromised VPN, backup server, or valid credentials, AppGuard isolates the ransomware payload and keeps it from spreading, exfiltrating data, or encrypting critical files.
-
Because AppGuard enforces runtime constraints before threat behavior, it does not rely on signatures, malware definitions, or the speed of detection. As a result, it is effective against zero‑day attacks, unknown variants, and living‑off‑the‑land techniques — all of which Akira and other advanced malware are using more and more.
Given how fast Akira operators evolve — from Windows to Linux, from ESXi to Nutanix, from C++ encryptors to Rust — relying solely on signature‑based detection or reactive incident response is a gamble.
What Business Owners Must Do Now
-
Review all external‑facing systems (VPN, backup servers, remote‑access services). Prioritize patching known‑exploited vulnerabilities.
-
Ensure multi‑factor authentication (MFA) is enforced everywhere possible — especially VPN, remote desktops, webmail, and admin accounts.
-
Audit your environment for unauthorized accounts, dormant accounts, excessive privileges, and unnecessary services. Lock down remote‑access tools and restrict admin privileges tightly.
-
And critically: adopt endpoint protection that does more than detect and respond — adopt isolation and containment with a proven solution like AppGuard.
If you are a business owner or IT leader, the stakes are too high to rely on hope or happenstance. The defenders of yesterday are already part of the problem. It is time to be proactive.
Talk with us at CHIPS about how AppGuard can prevent an Akira‑style incident in your organization before it happens. Protect your people, your data, and your future with isolation and containment.
Like this article? Please share it with others!
Comments